# Crash Course: runtime reflection system # Table of Contents * [Introduction](#introduction) * [Names and identifiers](#names-and-identifiers) * [Reflection in a nutshell](#reflection-in-a-nutshell) * [Any as in any type](#any-as-in-any-type) * [Enjoy the runtime](#enjoy-the-runtime) * [Container support](#container-support) * [Pointer-like types](#pointer-like-types) * [Policies: the more, the less](#policies-the-more-the-less) * [Named constants and enums](#named-constants-and-enums) * [Properties and meta objects](#properties-and-meta-objects) * [Unregister types](#unregister-types) # Introduction Reflection (or rather, its lack) is a trending topic in the C++ world and, in the specific case of `EnTT`, a tool that can unlock a lot of other features. I looked for a third-party library that met my needs on the subject, but I always came across some details that I didn't like: macros, being intrusive, too many allocations. In one word: unsatisfactory.
I finally decided to write a built-in, non-intrusive and macro-free runtime reflection system for `EnTT`. Maybe I didn't do better than others or maybe yes, time will tell me, but at least I can model this tool around the library to which it belongs and not the opposite. # Names and identifiers The meta system doesn't force users to rely on the tools provided by the library when it comes to working with names and identifiers. It does this by offering an API that works with opaque identifiers that may or may not be generated by means of a hashed string.
This means that users can assign any type of identifier to the meta objects, as long as they are numeric. It doesn't matter if they are generated at runtime, at compile-time or with custom functions. That being said, the examples in the following sections are all based on the `hashed_string` class as provided by this library. Therefore, where an identifier is required, it's likely that a user defined literal is used as follows: ```cpp auto factory = entt::meta().type("reflected_type"_hs); ``` For what it's worth, this is likely completely equivalent to: ```cpp auto factory = entt::meta().type(42); ``` Obviously, human-readable identifiers are more convenient to use and highly recommended. # Reflection in a nutshell Reflection always starts from real types (users cannot reflect imaginary types and it would not make much sense, we wouldn't be talking about reflection anymore).
To create a meta node, the library provides the `meta` function that accepts a type to reflect as a template parameter: ```cpp auto factory = entt::meta(); ``` This isn't enough to _export_ the given type and make it visible though.
The returned value is a factory object to use to continue building the meta type. In order to make the type _visible_, users can assign it an identifier: ```cpp auto factory = entt::meta().type("reflected_type"_hs); ``` Or use the default one, that is, the built-in identifier for the given type: ```cpp auto factory = entt::meta().type(); ``` Identifiers are important because users can retrieve meta types at runtime by searching for them by _name_ other than by type.
On the other hand, there are cases in which users can be interested in adding features to a reflected type so that the reflection system can use it correctly under the hood, but they don't want to also make the type _searchable_. In this case, it's sufficient not to invoke `type`. A factory is such that all its member functions returns the factory itself or a decorated version of it. This object can be used to add the following: * _Constructors_. Actual constructors can be assigned to a reflected type by specifying their list of arguments. Free functions (namely, factories) can be used as well, as long as the return type is the expected one. From a client's point of view, nothing changes if a constructor is a free function or an actual constructor.
Use the `ctor` member function for this purpose: ```cpp entt::meta().ctor().ctor<&factory>(); ``` * _Destructors_. Free functions can be set as destructors of reflected types. The purpose is to give users the ability to free up resources that require special treatment before an object is actually destroyed.
Use the `dtor` member function for this purpose: ```cpp entt::meta().dtor<&destroy>(); ``` A function should neither delete nor explicitly invoke the destructor of a given instance. * _Data members_. Both real data members of the underlying type and static and global variables, as well as constants of any kind, can be attached to a meta type. From a client's point of view, all the variables associated with the reflected type will appear as if they were part of the type itself.
Use the `data` member function for this purpose: ```cpp entt::meta() .data<&my_type::static_variable>("static"_hs) .data<&my_type::data_member>("member"_hs) .data<&global_variable>("global"_hs); ``` This function requires as an argument the identifier to give to the meta data once created. Users can then access meta data at runtime by searching for them by _name_.
Data members can also be defined by means of a _setter_ and _getter_. Setters and getters can be either free functions, class members or a mix of them, as long as they respect the required signatures. This approach is also convenient to create a read-only variable from a non-const data member: ```cpp entt::meta().data("member"_hs); ``` Refer to the inline documentation for all the details. * _Member functions_. Both real member functions of the underlying type and free functions can be attached to a meta type. From a client's point of view, all the functions associated with the reflected type will appear as if they were part of the type itself.
Use the `func` member function for this purpose: ```cpp entt::meta() .func<&my_type::static_function>("static"_hs) .func<&my_type::member_function>("member"_hs) .func<&free_function>("free"_hs); ``` This function requires as an argument the identifier to give to the meta function once created. Users can then access meta functions at runtime by searching for them by _name_. * _Base classes_. A base class is such that the underlying type is actually derived from it. In this case, the reflection system tracks the relationship and allows for implicit casts at runtime when required.
Use the `base` member function for this purpose: ```cpp entt::meta().base(); ``` From now on, wherever a `base_type` is required, an instance of `derived_type` will also be accepted. * _Conversion functions_. Actual types can be converted, this is a fact. Just think of the relationship between a `double` and an `int` to see it. Similar to bases, conversion functions allow users to define conversions that will be implicitly performed by the reflection system when required.
Use the `conv` member function for this purpose: ```cpp entt::meta().conv(); ``` That's all, everything users need to create meta types and enjoy the reflection system. At first glance it may not seem that much, but users usually learn to appreciate it over time.
Also, do not forget what these few lines hide under the hood: a built-in, non-intrusive and macro-free system for reflection in C++. Features that are definitely worth the price, at least for me. ## Any as in any type The reflection system comes with its own `meta_any` type. It may seem redundant since C++17 introduced `std::any`, but it is not.
In fact, the _type_ returned by an `std::any` is a const reference to an `std::type_info`, an implementation defined class that's not something everyone wants to see in a software. Furthermore, the class `std::type_info` suffers from some design flaws and there is even no way to _convert_ an `std::type_info` into a meta type, thus linking the two worlds. The class `meta_any` offers an API similar to that of its most famous counterpart and serves the same purpose of being an opaque container for any type of value.
It minimizes the allocations required, which are almost absent thanks to _SBO_ techniques. In fact, unless users deal with _fat types_ and create instances of them through the reflection system, allocations are at zero. Creating instances of `meta_any`, whether empty or from existing objects, is trivial: ```cpp // a container for an int entt::meta_any any{0}; // an empty container entt::meta_any empty{}; ``` The `meta_any` class takes also the burden of destroying the contained object when required.
Furthermore, an instance of `meta_any` is not tied to a specific type. Therefore, the wrapper will be reconfigured by assigning it an object of a different type than the one contained, so as to be able to handle the new instance. A particularly interesting feature of this class is that it can also be used as an opaque container for non-const unmanaged objects: ```cpp int value; entt::meta_any any{std::ref(value)}; ``` In other words, whenever `meta_any` intercepts a `reference_wrapper`, it acts as a reference to the original instance rather than making a copy of it. The contained object is never destroyed and users must ensure that its lifetime exceeds that of the container.
Similarly, it's possible to create non-owning copies of `meta_any` from existing ones: ```cpp // aliasing constructor entt::meta_any ref = any.ref(); ``` In this case, it doesn't matter if the starting container actually holds an object or acts already as a reference for unmanaged elements, the new instance thus created won't create copies and will only serve as a reference for the original item.
It means that, starting from the example above, both `ref` and` any` will point to the same object, whether it's initially contained in `any` or already an unmanaged one. This is particularly useful for passing instances of `meta_any` belonging to the external context by reference to a function or a constructor rather than making copies of them. The `meta_any` class also has a `type` member function that returns the meta type of the contained value, if any. The member functions `try_cast`, `cast` and `convert` are then used to know if the underlying object has a given type as a base or if it can be converted implicitly to it. ## Enjoy the runtime Once the web of reflected types has been constructed, it's a matter of using it at runtime where required.
All this has the great merit that, unlike the vast majority of the things present in this library and closely linked to the compile-time, the reflection system stands in fact as a non-intrusive tool for the runtime. To search for a reflected type there are a few options: ```cpp // direct access to a reflected type auto by_type = entt::resolve(); // lookup of a reflected type by identifier auto by_id = entt::resolve_id("reflected_type"_hs); // lookup of a reflected type by type id auto by_type_id = entt::resolve_type(entt::type_info::id()); ``` There exits also an overload of the `resolve` function to use to iterate all the reflected types at once as well as a `resolve_if` function to use to perform more refined searches when needed: ```cpp resolve([](auto type) { // ... }); auto by_lookup = resolve_if([](auto type) { return type.is_floating_point(); }); ``` In all cases, the returned value is an instance of `meta_type`. This kind of objects offer an API to know their _runtime identifiers_, to iterate all the meta objects associated with them and even to build instances of the underlying type.
Refer to the inline documentation for all the details. The meta objects that compose a meta type are accessed in the following ways: * _Meta constructors_. They are accessed by types of arguments: ```cpp auto ctor = entt::resolve().ctor(); ``` The returned type is `meta_ctor` and may be invalid if there is no constructor that accepts the supplied arguments or at least some types from which they are derived or to which they can be converted.
A meta constructor offers an API to know the number of its arguments and their expected meta types. Furthermor, it's possible to invoke it and therefore to construct new instances of the underlying type. * _Meta data_. They are accessed by _name_: ```cpp auto data = entt::resolve().data("member"_hs); ``` The returned type is `meta_data` and may be invalid if there is no meta data object associated with the given identifier.
A meta data object offers an API to query the underlying type (for example, to know if it's a const or a static one), to get the meta type of the variable and to set or get the contained value. * _Meta functions_. They are accessed by _name_: ```cpp auto func = entt::resolve().func("member"_hs); ``` The returned type is `meta_func` and may be invalid if there is no meta function object associated with the given identifier.
A meta function object offers an API to query the underlying type (for example, to know if it's a const or a static function), to know the number of arguments, the meta return type and the meta types of the parameters. In addition, a meta function object can be used to invoke the underlying function and then get the return value in the form of a `meta_any` object. * _Meta bases_. They are accessed through the _name_ of the base types: ```cpp auto base = entt::resolve().base("base"_hs); ``` The returned type is `meta_base` and may be invalid if there is no meta base object associated with the given identifier.
Meta bases aren't meant to be used directly, even though they are freely accessible. They expose only a few methods to use to know the meta type of the base class and to convert a raw pointer between types. * _Meta conversion functions_. They are accessed by type: ```cpp auto conv = entt::resolve().conv(); ``` The returned type is `meta_conv` and may be invalid if there is no meta conversion function associated with the given type.
The meta conversion functions are as thin as the meta bases and with a very similar interface. The sole difference is that they return a newly created instance wrapped in a `meta_any` object when they convert between different types. All the objects thus obtained as well as the meta types can be explicitly converted to a boolean value to check if they are valid: ```cpp if(auto func = entt::resolve().func("member"_hs); func) { // ... } ``` Furthermore, all meta objects can be iterated through an overload that accepts a callback through which to return them. As an example: ```cpp entt::resolve().data([](auto data) { // ... }); ``` A meta type can be used to `construct` actual instances of the underlying type.
In particular, the `construct` member function accepts a variable number of arguments and searches for a match. It then returns a `meta_any` object that may or may not be initialized, depending on whether a suitable constructor has been found or not. There is no object that wraps the destructor of a meta type nor a `destroy` member function in its API. The reason is quickly explained: destructors are invoked implicitly by `meta_any` behind the scenes and users have not to deal with them explicitly. Furthermore, they have no name, cannot be searched and wouldn't have member functions to expose anyway.
Therefore, exposing destructors would be pointless and would add nothing to the library itself. Meta types and meta objects in general contain much more than what is said: a plethora of functions in addition to those listed whose purposes and uses go unfortunately beyond the scope of this document.
I invite anyone interested in the subject to look at the code, experiment and read the inline documentation to get the best out of this powerful tool. ## Container support The meta module supports containers of all types out of the box.
Moreover, _containers_ doesn't necessarily mean those offered by the C++ standard library. In fact, user defined data structures can also work with the meta system in many cases. To make a container be recognized by the meta module, users are required to provide specializations for either the `meta_sequence_container_traits` class or the `meta_associative_container_traits` class, according with the actual _type_ of the container.
`EnTT` already exports the specializations for some common classes. In particular: * `std::vector` and `std::array` are exported as _sequence containers_. * `std::map`, `std::set` and their unordered counterparts are exported as _associative containers_. It's important to include the header file `container.hpp` to make these specializations available to the compiler when needed.
The same file also contains many examples for the users that are interested in making their own containers available to the meta system. When a specialization of the `meta_sequence_container_traits` class exists, the meta system treats the wrapped type as a sequence container. In a similar way, a type is treated as an associative container if a specialization of the `meta_associative_container_traits` class is found for it.
Proxy objects are returned by dedicated members of the `meta_any` class. The following is a deliberately verbose example of how users can access a proxy object for a sequence container: ```cpp std::vector vec{1, 2, 3}; entt::meta_any any{std::ref(vec)}; if(any.type().is_sequence_container()) { if(auto view = any.as_sequence_container(); view) { // ... } } ``` The method to use to get a proxy object for associative containers is `as_associative_container` instead.
It goes without saying that it's not necessary to perform a double check. Instead, it's sufficient to query the meta type or verify that the proxy object is valid. In fact, proxies are contextually convertible to bool to know if they are valid. For example, invalid proxies are returned when the wrapped object isn't a container.
In all cases, users aren't expected to _reflect_ containers explicitly. It's sufficient to assign a container for which a specialization of the traits classes exists to a `meta_any` object to be able to get its proxy object. The interface of the `meta_sequence_container` proxy object is the same for all types of sequence containers, although the available features differ from case to case. In particular: * The `value_type` member function returns the meta type of the elements. * The `size` member function returns the number of elements in the container as an unsigned integer value: ```cpp const auto size = view.size(); ``` * The `resize` member function allows to resize the wrapped container and returns true in case of succes: ```cpp const bool ok = view.resize(3u); ``` For example, it's not possible to resize fixed size containers. * The `clear` member function allows to clear the wrapped container and returns true in case of success: ```cpp const bool ok = view.clear(); ``` For example, it's not possible to clear fixed size containers. * The `begin` and `end` member functions return opaque iterators that can be used to iterate the container directly: ```cpp for(entt::meta_any element: view) { // ... } ``` In all cases, given an underlying container of type `C`, the returned element contains an object of type `C::value_type` which therefore depends on the actual container.
All meta iterators are input iterators and don't offer an indirection operator on purpose. * The `insert` member function can be used to add elements to the container. It accepts a meta iterator and the element to insert: ```cpp auto last = view.end(); // appends an integer to the container view.insert(last.handle(), 42); ``` This function returns a meta iterator pointing to the inserted element and a boolean value to indicate whether the operation was successful or not. Note that a call to `insert` may silently fail in case of fixed size containers or whether the arguments aren't at least convertible to the required types.
Since the meta iterators are contextually convertible to bool, users can rely on them to know if the operation has failed on the actual container or upstream, for example for an argument conversion problem. * The `erase` member function can be used to remove elements from the container. It accepts a meta iterator to the element to remove: ```cpp auto first = view.begin(); // removes the first element from the container view.erase(first); ``` This function returns a meta iterator following the last removed element and a boolean value to indicate whether the operation was successful or not. Note that a call to `erase` may silently fail in case of fixed size containers. * The `operator[]` can be used to access elements in a container. It accepts a single argument, that is the position of the element to return: ```cpp for(std::size_t pos{}, last = view.size(); pos < last; ++pos) { entt::meta_any value = view[pos]; // ... } ``` The function returns instances of `meta_any` that directly refer to the actual elements. Modifying the returned object will then directly modify the element inside the container. Similarly, also the interface of the `meta_associative_container` proxy object is the same for all types of associative containers. However, there are some differences in behavior in the case of key-only containers. In particular: * The `key_only` member function returns true if the wrapped container is a key-only one. * The `key_type` member function returns the meta type of the keys. * The `mapped_type` member function returns an invalid meta type for key-only containers and the meta type of the mapped values for all other types of containers. * The `value_type` member function returns the meta type of the elements.
For example, it returns the meta type of `int` for `std::set` while it returns the meta type of `std::pair` for `std::map`. * The `size` member function returns the number of elements in the container as an unsigned integer value: ```cpp const auto size = view.size(); ``` * The `clear` member function allows to clear the wrapped container and returns true in case of success: ```cpp const bool ok = view.clear(); ``` * The `begin` and `end` member functions return opaque iterators that can be used to iterate the container directly: ```cpp for(std::pair element: view) { // ... } ``` In all cases, given an underlying container of type `C`, the returned element is a key-value pair where the key has type `C::key_type` and the value has type `C::mapped_type`. Since key-only containers don't have a mapped type, their _value_ is nothing more than an invalid `meta_any` object.
All meta iterators are input iterators and don't offer an indirection operator on purpose. While the accessed key is usually constant in the associative containers and is therefore returned by copy, the value (if any) is wrapped by an instance of `meta_any` that directly refers to the actual element. Modifying it will then directly modify the element inside the container. * The `insert` member function can be used to add elements to the container. It accepts two arguments, respectively the key and the value to be inserted: ```cpp auto last = view.end(); // appends an integer to the container view.insert(last.handle(), 42, 'c'); ``` This function returns a boolean value to indicate whether the operation was successful or not. Note that a call to `insert` may fail when the arguments aren't at least convertible to the required types. * The `erase` member function can be used to remove elements from the container. It accepts a single argument, that is the key to be removed: ```cpp view.erase(42); ``` This function returns a boolean value to indicate whether the operation was successful or not. Note that a call to `erase` may fail when the argument isn't at least convertible to the required type. * The `operator[]` can be used to access elements in a container. It accepts a single argument, that is the key of the element to return: ```cpp entt::meta_any value = view[42]; ``` The function returns instances of `meta_any` that directly refer to the actual elements. Modifying the returned object will then directly modify the element inside the container. Container support is deliberately minimal but theoretically sufficient to satisfy all needs. ## Pointer-like types As with containers, it's also possible to communicate to the meta system which types to consider _pointers_. This will allow to dereference instances of `meta_any`, obtaining light _references_ to the pointed objects that are also correctly associated with their meta types.
To make the meta system recognize a type as _pointer-like_, users can specialize the `is_meta_pointer_like` class. `EnTT` already exports the specializations for some common classes. In particular: * All types of raw pointers. * `std::uniqe_ptr` and `std::shared_ptr`. It's important to include the header file `pointer.hpp` to make these specializations available to the compiler when needed.
The same file also contains many examples for the users that are interested in making their own containers available to the meta system. When a type is recognized as a pointer-like one by the meta system, it's possible to dereference the instances of `meta_any` that contain these objects. The following is a deliberately verbose example to show how to use this feature: ```cpp int value = 42; // meta type equivalent to that of int * entt::meta_any any{&value}; if(any.type().is_meta_pointer_like()) { // meta type equivalent to that of int if(entt::meta_any ref = *any; ref) { // ... } } ``` It goes without saying that it's not necessary to perform a double check. Instead, it's sufficient to query the meta type or verify that the returned object is valid. For example, invalid instances are returned when the wrapped object hasn't a pointer-like type.
Note that dereferencing a pointer-like object returns an instance of `meta_any` which refers to the pointed object and allows users to modify it directly. ## Policies: the more, the less Policies are a kind of compile-time directives that can be used when recording reflection information.
Their purpose is to require slightly different behavior than the default in some specific cases. For example, when reading a given data member, its value is returned wrapped in a `meta_any` object which, by default, makes a copy of it. For large objects or if the caller wants to access the original instance, this behavior isn't desirable. Policies are there to offer a solution to this and other problems. There are a few alternatives available at the moment: * The _as-is_ policy, associated with the type `entt::as_is_t`.
This is the default policy. In general, it should never be used explicitly, since it's implicitly selected if no other policy is specified.
In this case, the return values of the functions as well as the properties exposed as data members are always returned by copy in a dedicated wrapper and therefore associated with their original meta types. * The _as-void_ policy, associated with the type `entt::as_void_t`.
Its purpose is to discard the return value of a meta object, whatever it is, thus making it appear as if its type were `void`.
If the use with functions is obvious, it must be said that it's also possible to use this policy with constructors and data members. In the first case, the constructor will be invoked but the returned wrapper will actually be empty. In the second case, instead, the property will not be accessible for reading. As an example of use: ```cpp entt::meta().func<&my_type::member_function, entt::as_void_t>("member"_hs); ``` * The _as-ref_ policy, associated with the type `entt::as_ref_t`.
It allows to build wrappers that act as references to unmanaged objects. Modifying the object contained in the wrapper for which the _reference_ was requested will make it possible to directly modify the instance used to initialize the wrapper itself.
This policy works with constructors (for example, when objects are taken from an external container rather than created on demand), data members and functions in general (as long as their return types are lvalue references). As an example of use: ```cpp entt::meta().data<&my_type::data_member, entt::as_ref_t>("member"_hs); ``` Some uses are rather trivial, but it's useful to note that there are some less obvious corner cases that can in turn be solved with the use of policies. ## Named constants and enums A special mention should be made for constant values and enums. It wouldn't be necessary, but it will help distracted readers. As mentioned, the `data` member function can be used to reflect constants of any type among the other things.
This allows users to create meta types for enums that will work exactly like any other meta type built from a class. Similarly, arithmetic types can be enriched with constants of special meaning where required.
Personally, I find it very useful not to export what is the difference between enums and classes in C++ directly in the space of the reflected types. All the values thus exported will appear to users as if they were constant data members of the reflected types. Exporting constant values or elements from an enum is as simple as ever: ```cpp entt::meta() .data("a_value"_hs) .data("another_value"_hs); entt::meta().data<2048>("max_int"_hs); ``` It goes without saying that accessing them is trivial as well. It's a matter of doing the following, as with any other data member of a meta type: ```cpp auto value = entt::resolve().data("a_value"_hs).get({}).cast(); auto max = entt::resolve().data("max_int"_hs).get({}).cast(); ``` As a side note, remember that all this happens behind the scenes without any allocation because of the small object optimization performed by the `meta_any` class. ## Properties and meta objects Sometimes (for example, when it comes to creating an editor) it might be useful to attach properties to the meta objects created. Fortunately, this is possible for most of them.
For the meta objects that support properties, the member functions of the factory used for registering them will return a decorated version of the factory itself. The latter can be used to attach properties to the last created meta object.
Apparently, it's more difficult to say than to do: ```cpp entt::meta().type("reflected_type"_hs).prop("tooltip"_hs, "message"); ``` Properties are always in the key/value form. There are no restrictions on the type of the key or value, as long as they are copy constructible objects.
Multiple formats are supported when it comes to defining a property: * Properties as key/value pairs: ```cpp entt::meta().type("reflected_type"_hs).prop("tooltip"_hs, "message"); ``` * Properties as `std::pair`s: ```cpp entt::meta().type("reflected_type"_hs).prop(std::make_pair("tooltip"_hs, "message")); ``` * Key only properties: ```cpp entt::meta().type("reflected_type"_hs).prop(my_enum::key_only); ``` * Properties as `std::tuple`s: ```cpp entt::meta().type("reflected_type"_hs).prop(std::make_tuple(std::make_pair("tooltip"_hs, "message"), my_enum::key_only)); ``` A tuple contains one or more properties. All of them are treated individually. * Annotations: ```cpp entt::meta().type("reflected_type"_hs).prop(&property_generator); ``` An annotation is an invocable object that returns one or more properties. All of them are treated individually. It's possible to invoke the `prop` function several times if needed, one for each property to associate with the last meta object created: ```cpp entt::meta() .type("reflected_type"_hs) .prop(entt::hashed_string{"Name"}, "Reflected Type") .data<&my_type::data_member>("member"_hs) .prop(std::make_pair("tooltip"_hs, "Member")) .prop(my_enum::a_value, 42); ``` Alternatively, the `props` function is available to associate several properties at a time. However, in this case properties in the key/value form aren't allowed, since they would be interpreted as two different properties rather than a single one. The meta objects for which properties are supported are currently the meta types, meta constructors, meta data and meta functions. It's not possible to attach properties to other types of meta objects and the factory returned as a result of their construction won't allow such an operation. These types offer a couple of member functions named `prop` to iterate all properties at once or to search a specific property by key: ```cpp // iterate all properties of a meta type entt::resolve().prop([](auto prop) { // ... }); // search for a given property by name auto prop = entt::resolve().prop("tooltip"_hs); ``` Meta properties are objects having a fairly poor interface, all in all. They only provide the `key` and the `value` member functions to be used to retrieve the key and the value contained in the form of `meta_any` objects, respectively. ## Unregister types A type registered with the reflection system can also be unregistered. This means unregistering all its data members, member functions, conversion functions and so on. However, the base classes won't be unregistered, since they don't necessarily depend on it. Similarly, implicitly generated types (as an example, the meta types implicitly generated for function parameters when needed) won't be unregistered.
Roughly speaking, unregistering a type means disconnecting all associated meta objects from it and making its identifier no longer visible. The underlying node will remain available though, as if it were implicitly generated: ```cpp entt::meta().reset(); ``` The type can be re-registered later with a completely different name and form.